Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 973 days newer than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 300% better in Need For Speed Unbound than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim - 100 vs 25 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Sep 1st, 2021
FPS
25
25%
Value, €/FPS
€32.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€809.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €809.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6912 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
100
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Sep 1st, 2021
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Sep 1st, 2021
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
29%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Sep 1st, 2021
Core i5-11300H
3.1 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1689
70%
Multi-Core
4940
43%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i5-11300H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 8 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
