Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS TUF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 2185 days newer than ASUS TUF.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 328% better in Battlefield V than ASUS TUF - 167 vs 39 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 8th, 2018 • 1st Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 8th, 2018 • 1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
51.84 GPixel/s
64%
Texel Fillrate
77.76 GTexel/s
32%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 8th, 2018 • 1st Variation
Core i5-8300H
2.3 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1269
53%
Multi-Core
3741
33%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| May 8th, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i5-8300H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 8 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
