Key Differences
In short — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper MSI Katana GF76 17 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI Katana GF76 17 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 4% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 - $972.07 vs $1017.12
- Up to 4% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than ASUS TUF A16 - $972.07 vs $1017.12 per FPS
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for €1,017.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184661 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
1
100%
Value, €/FPS
€972.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€972.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €972.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 375 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
20th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
20th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
20th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
2nd Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
97%
Multi-Core
7887
85%
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 17.3" |
