Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper MSI GF63 Premium on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 222% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI GF63 Premium - 87 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 54% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI GF63 Premium - $11.69 vs $25.16 per FPS
Advantages of MSI GF63 Premium Gaming Laptop
- Up to 33% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 - $679.28 vs $1017.12
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
20th Variation
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1017.12
66%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,017.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189982 minutes ago
Buy for €679.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
20th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
20th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
20th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i5-10300H
2.5 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1369
70%
Multi-Core
4008
43%
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | MSI GF63 Premium Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i5-10300H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
