Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive HP Victus on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 41% better in Dead Space than HP Victus - 62 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than HP Victus - $963.95 vs $1350.45
- Up to 49% better value when playing Dead Space than HP Victus - $15.55 vs $30.69 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
17th Variation
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€963.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €963.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7811 minutes ago
Buy for €1,350.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7823 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
17th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
17th Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
17th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
4th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800H
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1749
89%
Multi-Core
7120
77%
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | HP Victus Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800H |
Radeon RX 7600S | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |