Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF F15 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 2200% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than ASUS TUF F15 - 23 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 95% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than ASUS TUF F15 - $36.43 vs $692.79 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF F15 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 17% cheaper than Asus TUF A16 - $692.79 vs $837.83
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
11th Variation
FPS
23
100%
Value, €/FPS
€36.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€837.83
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €837.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 337 minutes ago
Buy for €692.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183081 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
11th Variation
18th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
18th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
18th Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
97%
Multi-Core
7887
85%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF F15 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
