Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive HP Victus on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 93% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than HP Victus - 87 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than HP Victus - $980.17 vs $1350.45
- Up to 62% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than HP Victus - $11.27 vs $30.01 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
10th Variation
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€980.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €980.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3240 minutes ago
Buy for €1,350.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3250 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
10th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
10th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
4th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800H
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1749
89%
Multi-Core
7120
77%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | HP Victus Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
