Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS TUF A17 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 12 days newer than ASUS TUF A17.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 36% better in Rust than ASUS TUF A17 - 113 vs 83 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 6192 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Apr 19th, 2024 • 13th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Apr 19th, 2024 • 13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Apr 19th, 2024 • 13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
82%
Multi-Core
9281
81%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF A17 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 19th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
