Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Asus on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 97 days newer than Asus.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 46% better in Battlefield IV than Asus - 236 vs 162 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 25th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 25th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 25th, 2024 • 2nd Variation
Core i5-12500
3.0 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2311
96%
Multi-Core
9079
79%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Asus Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 25th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i5-12500 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
