Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS 2024 Vivobook 16” 3200x2000 120Hz on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than ASUS 2024 Vivobook 16” 3200x2000 120Hz - 62 vs 56 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 6149 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
88%
Multi-Core
11484
70%
ASUS 2024 Vivobook 16” 3200x2000 120Hz Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
