Key Differences
In short — ASUS ROG Strix G16 outperforms acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of ASUS ROG Strix G16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA - 80 vs 76 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
76
95%
Value, €/FPS
€21.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1665.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,665.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2251
84%
Multi-Core
12037
76%
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2695
100%
Multi-Core
15815
100%
CPU Winner
acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS ROG Strix G16 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
