Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-71K5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1400 days newer than Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-71K5.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 55% better in DOOM Eternal than Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-71K5 - 247 vs 159 FPS
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
FPS
159
64%
Value, €/FPS
€7.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1171.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,171.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7473 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
247
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
88.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
220.8 GTexel/s
90%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
92%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-71K5 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
300 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
