Key Differences
In short — Acer Nitro 16 outperforms Acer Predator Triton 300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Nitro 16 is 1343 days newer than Acer Predator Triton 300.
Advantages of Acer Nitro 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 148% better in Rust than Acer Predator Triton 300 - 99 vs 40 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Aug 1st, 2020 • 9th Variation
FPS
40
40%
Value, €/FPS
€31.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1242.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,242.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Aug 1st, 2020 • 9th Variation
Apr 5th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Aug 1st, 2020 • 9th Variation
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
75.84 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
170.6 GTexel/s
94%
Apr 5th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Aug 1st, 2020 • 9th Variation
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1456
62%
Multi-Core
5377
49%
Apr 5th, 2024 • 1st Variation
Ryzen 7 7840HS
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2365
100%
Multi-Core
11008
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Nitro 16 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2024 |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
