Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — acer Predator Helios Neo 16 outperforms the more expensive Acer Nitro V on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of acer Predator Helios Neo 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Acer Nitro V - 94 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Acer Nitro V - $1209.54 vs $1216.21
- Up to 2% better value when playing Deathloop than Acer Nitro V - $12.87 vs $13.08 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
11th Variation
FPS
94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1209.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,209.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 423 minutes ago
Aug 2nd, 2024 • 2nd Variation
FPS
93
99%
Value, €/FPS
€13.08/FPS
98%
Price, €
€1216.21
99%
Buy for €1,216.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 425 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
11th Variation
Aug 2nd, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Aug 2nd, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
Aug 2nd, 2024 • 2nd Variation
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
97%
Multi-Core
16426
99%
acer Predator Helios Neo 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Nitro V Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Aug 2nd, 2024 |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
