Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 2024 outperforms the cheaper MSI Katana GF76 17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 2024 Laptop
- Performs up to 104% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than MSI Katana GF76 17 - 143 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than MSI Katana GF76 17 - $12.34 vs $12.86 per FPS
Advantages of MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 49% cheaper than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 2024 - $900.00 vs $1764.86
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1764.86
50%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,764.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 320 minutes ago
Buy for €900 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 323 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
68%
Multi-Core
7887
48%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 2024 Laptop | vs | MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 17.3" |