The Radeon RX 6950 XT is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R5 240 OEM and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $756.76 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 94% cheaper – $49.54 vs $806.30
- Consumes up to 85% less energy – 50 vs 335 Watts
Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Radeon R5 240 OEM for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, €
€806.3
6%
Value, €/FPS
€4.74/FPS
26%
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
24%
Min 1% FPS
15
14%
Price, €
€49.54
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
2%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
3%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
3%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6950 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R5 240 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
| $1,099.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Navi II | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 335 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
576 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
295.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 6.24 GPixel/s |
739.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 18.72 GTexel/s |
23.65 TFLOPS | FP32 | 599 GFLOPS |
