The Radeon RX 6550M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6550M
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 80 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 6550M vs GeForce RTX 4070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6550M
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
70
46%
Min 1% FPS
36
39%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070
Apr 12th, 2023
Average FPS
152
100%
Min 1% FPS
92
100%
Price, €
€657.65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.32/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€657.65
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€720.71
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€788.29
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,693.68
In Stock
Radeon RX 6550M vs GeForce RTX 4070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6550M vs GeForce RTX 4070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6550M vs GeForce RTX 4070 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6550M
Jan 4th, 2023
Memory
4 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
144 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
90.88 GPixel/s
57%
Texture Fillrate
181.8 GTexel/s
40%
FP32
5.816 TFLOPS
20%
GeForce RTX 4070
Apr 12th, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
29.15 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6550M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 12th, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | $599.00 |
Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
80 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
144 GB/s | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
90.88 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 158.4 GPixel/s |
181.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 455.4 GTexel/s |
5.816 TFLOPS | FP32 | 29.15 TFLOPS |