The Radeon RX 5700 is a much faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 180 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The Radeon RX 5700 is better in every way
Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5700
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
97
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
82%
Min 1% FPS
42
78%
Price, €
€899.1
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.23/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5700
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
110.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
248.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.949 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
94%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
76%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
76%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
$349.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
Navi | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336.6 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
110.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.3 GPixel/s |
248.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 189.4 GTexel/s |
7.949 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.06 TFLOPS |