The Radeon RX 560 XT is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4090. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560 XT
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 150 vs 450 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce RTX 4090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Average FPS
64
29%
Min 1% FPS
31
21%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4090
Sep 20th, 2022
Average FPS
223
100%
Min 1% FPS
146
100%
Price, €
€2683.78
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.03/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€2,683.78
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€3,323.42
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€2,927.92
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce RTX 4090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce RTX 4090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce RTX 4090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
22%
Pixel Fillrate
39.23 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
137.3 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
4.394 TFLOPS
5%
GeForce RTX 4090
Sep 20th, 2022
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1010 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
82.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4090 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 20th, 2022 |
Not Available | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
Polaris | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 450 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1010 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
39.23 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 443.5 GPixel/s |
137.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1290 GTexel/s |
4.394 TFLOPS | FP32 | 82.58 TFLOPS |