The Radeon RX 560 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 240 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $123.20 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Up to 66% cheaper – $63.02 vs $186.22
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 30 vs 75 Watts
Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon R7 240 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
100%
Min 1% FPS
23
100%
Price, €
€186.22
33%
Value, €/FPS
€3.58/FPS
43%
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
79%
Min 1% FPS
16
70%
Price, €
€63.02
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€63.02
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€112.61
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon R7 240 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon R7 240 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 vs Radeon R7 240 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
66%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
17%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
17%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 18th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| $99.00 | MSRP | $69.00 |
| Polaris | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
20.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 5.6 GPixel/s |
81.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 14 GTexel/s |
2.611 TFLOPS | FP32 | 448 GFLOPS |
