In Battlefield 6, the Radeon RX 5300M is much slower than the Radeon RX 6800. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon RX 5300M
- Consumes up to 66% less energy – 85 vs 250 Watts
- Consumes up to 66% less energy
Radeon RX 6800
- Up to 507% faster in Battlefield 6 – 91 vs 15 FPS
- Up to 507% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 months and 15 days newer – Oct 28, 2020 vs Nov 13, 2019
- Is 11 months and 15 days newer
- Up to 433% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 3 GB
- Up to 433% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon RX 5300M vs Radeon RX 6800: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
91 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
68 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.94/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon RX 5300M vs Radeon RX 6800: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon RX 5300M vs Radeon RX 6800: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon RX 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Memory
3 GB
19%
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
46.24 GPixel/s
23%
Texture Fillrate
127.2 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
4.069 TFLOPS
25%
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
202.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
505.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.17 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon RX 5300M Nov 13th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 6800 Oct 28th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2019 | Released | Oct 28th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
| Navi Mobile (RX 5000M) | Generation | Navi II (RX 6000) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
85 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
