In Battlefield 6, the Radeon RX 5300M is much slower than the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon RX 5300M
- Is 2 weeks and 1 day newer – Nov 13, 2019 vs Oct 29, 2019
- Is 2 weeks and 1 day newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 85 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Up to 167% faster in Battlefield 6 – 40 vs 15 FPS
- Up to 167% faster in Battlefield 6
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 3 GB
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Average FPS
40 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
30 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.74/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon RX 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Memory
3 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
46.24 GPixel/s
54%
Texture Fillrate
127.2 GTexel/s
81%
FP32
4.069 TFLOPS
81%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon RX 5300M Nov 13th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Oct 29th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 13th, 2019 | Released | Oct 29th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $229.00 |
| Navi Mobile (RX 5000M) | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
85 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
