The Radeon RX 480 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $536.93 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 480
- Up to 67% cheaper – $269.37 vs $806.30
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 150 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
Radeon RX 480 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Average FPS
68
40%
Min 1% FPS
34
32%
Price, €
€269.37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.96/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, €
€806.3
33%
Value, €/FPS
€4.74/FPS
84%
Radeon RX 480 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 480 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 480 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
40.51 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
182.3 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
5.834 TFLOPS
25%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 480 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 29th, 2016 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$229.00 | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
| Arctic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 40.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
| 182.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
| 5.834 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |
