The Radeon RX 480 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $90.09 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 480
- Up to 25% cheaper – $269.37 vs $359.46
- Consumes up to 30% less energy – 150 vs 215 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Average FPS
68
63%
Min 1% FPS
34
56%
Price, €
€269.37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.96/FPS
84%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Average FPS
108
100%
Min 1% FPS
61
100%
Price, €
€359.46
74%
Value, €/FPS
€3.32/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€359.46
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€692.68
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€710.70
In Stock
Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
57%
Pixel Fillrate
40.51 GPixel/s
36%
Texture Fillrate
182.3 GTexel/s
64%
FP32
5.834 TFLOPS
64%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
113.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
283.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.062 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 480 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 29th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 9th, 2019 |
$229.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Arctic Islands | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 40.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 113.3 GPixel/s |
| 182.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 283.2 GTexel/s |
| 5.834 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.062 TFLOPS |
