The Radeon RX 480 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $100.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 480
- Up to 27% cheaper – $269.37 vs $369.37
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 20% less energy – 120 vs 150 Watts
Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Average FPS
68
82%
Min 1% FPS
34
77%
Price, €
€269.37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.96/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€369.37
72%
Value, €/FPS
€4.45/FPS
89%
Buy on Amazon
€369.37
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€162.12
In Stock
Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
89%
Pixel Fillrate
40.51 GPixel/s
48%
Texture Fillrate
182.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.834 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
93%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
93%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 480 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 29th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
$229.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Arctic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 40.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
182.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
5.834 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
