The Radeon RX 460 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 480 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $114.40 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- Up to 42% cheaper – $154.97 vs $269.37
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 75 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 480
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon RX 480 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
75%
Min 1% FPS
22
65%
Price, €
€154.97
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.03/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Average FPS
68
100%
Min 1% FPS
34
100%
Price, €
€269.37
57%
Value, €/FPS
€3.96/FPS
77%
Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon RX 480 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon RX 480 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 460 vs Radeon RX 480 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
47%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
37%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
37%
Radeon RX 480
Jun 29th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
40.51 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
182.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.834 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 8th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $229.00 |
| Arctic Islands | Generation | Arctic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 19.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 40.51 GPixel/s |
| 67.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 182.3 GTexel/s |
| 2.15 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.834 TFLOPS |
