The Radeon R9 M395X is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 M395X
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 70 vs 75 Watts
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Average FPS
57
78%
Min 1% FPS
26
70%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
€171.16
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€171.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€281.89
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€207.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€191.90
In Stock
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
95%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
49%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
87%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
44%
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
47.04 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
105.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.774 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 M395X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 2nd, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $179.00 |
| Gem System | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 96-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 168 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 23.14 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 47.04 GPixel/s |
| 92.54 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 105.8 GTexel/s |
| 2.961 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.774 TFLOPS |
