In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R9 M395X is quite a bit slower than the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R9 M395X
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 75 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 40% less energy
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Up to 82% faster in Battlefield 6 – 40 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 82% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 29, 2019 vs May 05, 2015
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Average FPS
40 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
30 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.74/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R9 M395X
May 5th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
48%
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
59%
FP32
2.961 TFLOPS
59%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R9 M395X May 5th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Oct 29th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 5th, 2015 | Released | Oct 29th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $229.00 |
| Gem System (R9 M300) | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
