The Radeon R9 390 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 580 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $143.25 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The Radeon RX 580 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 580
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 53% cheaper – $126.12 vs $269.37
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 185 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 580 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
96%
Min 1% FPS
33
94%
Price, €
€269.37
46%
Value, €/FPS
€4.02/FPS
45%
Radeon RX 580
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, €
€126.12
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.8/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€126.12
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€224.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 580 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 580 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs Radeon RX 580 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
83%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
83%
Radeon RX 580
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
42.88 GPixel/s
67%
Texture Fillrate
193 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.175 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $229.00 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
275 W | Power Consumption | 185 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 42.88 GPixel/s |
160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 193 GTexel/s |
5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.175 TFLOPS |