In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R9 380X is slower than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R9 380X
No clear advantages
GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 27% faster in Battlefield 6 – 19 vs 15 FPS
- Up to 27% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Nov 19, 2015
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 75 vs 190 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R9 380X vs GeForce GTX 1650: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
19 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
14 FPS
100%
Price, $
$249.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R9 380X vs GeForce GTX 1650: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R9 380X vs GeForce GTX 1650: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R9 380X
Nov 19th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
182.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
31.04 GPixel/s
58%
Texture Fillrate
124.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.973 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
75%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
75%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R9 380X Nov 19th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 19th, 2015 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $229.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Pirate Islands (R9 300) | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 190 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
