The Radeon R9 285 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 285
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 5% less energy – 180 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
58
67%
Min 1% FPS
27
57%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
100%
Min 1% FPS
47
100%
Price, €
€476.58
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.47/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€476.58
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€477.47
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€810.80
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€438.73
In Stock
Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 285
Sep 2nd, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s
69%
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
40%
FP32
3.29 TFLOPS
40%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 285 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 2nd, 2017 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
190 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
29.38 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
102.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 255.8 GTexel/s |
3.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.186 TFLOPS |