The Radeon R9 280X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4090. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 280X
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 250 vs 450 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 3 GB
Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce RTX 4090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 280X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
56
25%
Min 1% FPS
26
18%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4090
Sep 20th, 2022
Average FPS
223
100%
Min 1% FPS
146
100%
Price, €
€2683.78
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.03/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€2,683.78
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€3,323.42
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€2,927.92
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce RTX 4090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce RTX 4090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce RTX 4090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 280X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
3 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
32 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
128 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
4.096 TFLOPS
5%
GeForce RTX 4090
Sep 20th, 2022
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1010 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
82.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 280X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4090 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 20th, 2022 |
$299.00 | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
250 W | Power Consumption | 450 W |
Memory | ||
3 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
384-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1010 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
32 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 443.5 GPixel/s |
128 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1290 GTexel/s |
4.096 TFLOPS | FP32 | 82.58 TFLOPS |