In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R9 280 is much slower than the Radeon RX 7700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R9 280
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 200 vs 245 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Radeon RX 7700 XT
- Up to 4400% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 2 FPS
- Up to 4400% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Aug 25, 2023 vs Mar 04, 2014
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 3 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 7700 XT: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Aug 25th, 2023
Average FPS
90 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
67 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 7700 XT: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 7700 XT: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
240 GB/s
56%
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
19%
FP32
3.344 TFLOPS
10%
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Aug 25th, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
244.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
549.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.17 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R9 280 Mar 4th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 7700 XT Aug 25th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 4th, 2014 | Released | Aug 25th, 2023 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $449.00 |
| Volcanic Islands (R9 200) | Generation | Navi III (RX 7000) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
200 W | Power Consumption | 245 W |
