The Radeon R9 280 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 280
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 200 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 3 GB
Radeon R9 280 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Average FPS
53
43%
Min 1% FPS
24
34%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, €
€162.15
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€162.15
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€162.15
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€166.66
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€251.35
In Stock
Radeon R9 280 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 280 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 280 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
240 GB/s
47%
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
19%
FP32
3.344 TFLOPS
19%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 280 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
200 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 3 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.86 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 104.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 3.344 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
