The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 150 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce RTX 4070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
33%
Min 1% FPS
22
24%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070
Apr 12th, 2023
Average FPS
152
100%
Min 1% FPS
92
100%
Price, €
€657.65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.32/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€657.65
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€720.71
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€788.29
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,693.68
In Stock
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce RTX 4070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce RTX 4070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce RTX 4070 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
36%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
19%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
8%
GeForce RTX 4070
Apr 12th, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
29.15 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 12th, 2023 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 158.4 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 455.4 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 29.15 TFLOPS |
