In Battlefield 6, the Radeon R7 M260 is much slower than the Radeon RX 6900 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Radeon R7 M260
No clear advantages
Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Up to 10400% faster in Battlefield 6 – 105 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 10400% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Oct 28, 2020 vs Jun 11, 2014
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Radeon R7 M260 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
105 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2259.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$21.52/FPS
100%
![ASRock AMD Radeon RX6900XT Graphics Board GDDR6 16GB [Domestic Authorized Dealer] RX RX 6900 XT PG D 16G OC](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/gpus/B08QYQH7QW.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
Radeon R7 M260 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
Radeon R7 M260 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: Comparison of core performance specifications
Radeon R7 M260
Jun 11th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
3%
Pixel Fillrate
7.84 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
23.52 GTexel/s
3%
FP32
752.6 GFLOPS
3%
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.04 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R7 M260 Jun 11th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 6900 XT Oct 28th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2014 | Released | Oct 28th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $999.00 |
| Gem System (R7 M200) | Generation | Navi II (RX 6000) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| – | Power Consumption | 300 W |
