The Radeon R7 250 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6900 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $964.61 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- Up to 93% cheaper – $67.55 vs $1032.16
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 55 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6900 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
166
100%
Min 1% FPS
102
100%
Price, €
€1032.16
6%
Value, €/FPS
€6.21/FPS
26%
Buy on Amazon
€1,032.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€900.89
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€900.89
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€990.09
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€900.89
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,260.35
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,351.34
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,603.98
In Stock
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
4%
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.04 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | $999.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
Memory | ||
1 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
14.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 288 GPixel/s |
29.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 720 GTexel/s |
947.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 23.04 TFLOPS |