The Radeon R7 240 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $363.06 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Up to 85% cheaper – $63.02 vs $426.08
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 30 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 64
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
46%
Min 1% FPS
16
33%
Price, €
€63.02
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€63.02
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€112.61
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Average FPS
90
100%
Min 1% FPS
49
100%
Price, €
€426.08
14%
Value, €/FPS
€4.73/FPS
32%
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
15%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
6%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
4%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Vega |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 98.94 GPixel/s |
| 14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 395.8 GTexel/s |
| 448 GFLOPS | FP32 | 12.66 TFLOPS |
