The Radeon R7 240 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $199.12 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Up to 76% cheaper – $63.02 vs $262.14
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 30 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
57%
Min 1% FPS
16
43%
Price, €
€63.02
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€63.02
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€112.61
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
€262.14
24%
Value, €/FPS
€3.64/FPS
42%
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
10%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $159.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
5.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 55.2 GPixel/s |
14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 138 GTexel/s |
448 GFLOPS | FP32 | 4.416 TFLOPS |