Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 2023 days newer than Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 30 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 61% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Radeon R7 240 - 37 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 4 vs 2 GB
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 7315 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€225.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €225.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7314 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 240 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$69 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |