The Radeon R5 240 OEM is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $265.77 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 84% cheaper – $49.54 vs $315.31
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 50 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 3 vs 2 GB
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
61%
Min 1% FPS
15
45%
Price, €
€49.54
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Aug 18th, 2016
Average FPS
66
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, €
€315.31
15%
Value, €/FPS
€4.77/FPS
26%
Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 240 OEM vs GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
7%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
15%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
15%
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Aug 18th, 2016
Memory
3 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
81.98 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
123 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.935 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 240 OEM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 18th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 3 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.24 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 81.98 GPixel/s |
| 18.72 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 123 GTexel/s |
| 599 GFLOPS | FP32 | 3.935 TFLOPS |
