The Radeon R5 230 is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R5 230
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 19 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R5 230
Apr 3rd, 2014
Average FPS
102
100%
Min 1% FPS
57
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
63%
Min 1% FPS
31
54%
Price, €
€314.41
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.91/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€314.41
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€246.35
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€202.61
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€314.52
In Stock
Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R5 230
Apr 3rd, 2014
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
10.67 GB/s
8%
Pixel Fillrate
2.5 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
5 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
200 GFLOPS
7%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R5 230 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
19 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 10.67 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
| 5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
| 200 GFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |
