The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 GME and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $45.95 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 75 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590 GME
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 30% cheaper – $108.10 vs $154.05
- A much better value for money for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon RX 590 GME for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Nov 18th, 2016
Average FPS
51
73%
Min 1% FPS
22
63%
Price, €
€154.05
70%
Value, €/FPS
€3.02/FPS
51%
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, €
€108.1
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Nov 18th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
34.75 GPixel/s
76%
Texture Fillrate
121.6 GTexel/s
59%
FP32
3.892 TFLOPS
59%
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
45.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
204.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.543 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 5100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 18th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 9th, 2020 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 34.75 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 45.44 GPixel/s |
| 121.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 204.5 GTexel/s |
| 3.892 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.543 TFLOPS |
