The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 980 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $4.03 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Up to 4% cheaper – $108.13 vs $112.16
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 50 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 980 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
49
70%
Min 1% FPS
21
60%
Price, €
€108.13
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
73%
GeForce GTX 980
Sep 19th, 2014
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, €
€112.16
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.6/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€112.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€359.46
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€792.66
In Stock
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 980 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 980 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 980 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
43%
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
25%
Texture Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
49%
FP32
2.46 TFLOPS
49%
GeForce GTX 980
Sep 19th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
77.82 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
155.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.981 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 19th, 2014 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 19.22 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 77.82 GPixel/s |
| 76.86 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 155.6 GTexel/s |
| 2.46 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.981 TFLOPS |
