The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 970, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $251.33 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Up to 70% cheaper – $108.13 vs $359.46
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 66% less energy – 50 vs 148 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 970
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 970 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
49
75%
Min 1% FPS
21
66%
Price, €
€108.13
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 970
Sep 19th, 2014
Average FPS
65
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, €
€359.46
30%
Value, €/FPS
€5.53/FPS
40%
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 970 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 970 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs GeForce GTX 970 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
43%
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
29%
Texture Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
63%
FP32
2.46 TFLOPS
63%
GeForce GTX 970
Sep 19th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
65.97 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
122.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.92 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 4100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 10th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 19th, 2014 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 148 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 19.22 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 65.97 GPixel/s |
| 76.86 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 122.5 GTexel/s |
| 2.46 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.92 TFLOPS |
