Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 70 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 41% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than GeForce GTX 1650 - $1.03 vs $1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 65 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 10% better in Escape From Tarkov than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 129 vs 117 FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
117
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €120.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6480 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
129
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
59%
Price, €
€225.21
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €225.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6479 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
39%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
44%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$199 | MSRP | $149 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |