The Radeon Pro 460 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 7100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 460
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 7100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Average FPS
48
73%
Min 1% FPS
21
66%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
66
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, €
€154.94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
36%
Pixel Fillrate
14.51 GPixel/s
36%
Texture Fillrate
58.05 GTexel/s
32%
FP32
1.858 TFLOPS
32%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.728 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 81.28 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 39.78 GPixel/s |
| 58.05 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 179 GTexel/s |
| 1.858 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.728 TFLOPS |
