The Radeon Pro 460 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 460
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 35 vs 70 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Average FPS
48
66%
Min 1% FPS
21
57%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
€171.16
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€171.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€281.89
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€208.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€191.90
In Stock
Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 460
Oct 30th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
48%
Pixel Fillrate
14.51 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
58.05 GTexel/s
55%
FP32
1.858 TFLOPS
27%
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
47.04 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
105.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.774 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 460 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 2nd, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $179.00 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 96-bit |
| 81.28 GB/s | Bandwidth | 168 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.51 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 47.04 GPixel/s |
| 58.05 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 105.8 GTexel/s |
| 1.858 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.774 TFLOPS |
