The Radeon 660M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 660M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 40 vs 215 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 660M vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 660M
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
49
45%
Min 1% FPS
21
34%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Average FPS
108
100%
Min 1% FPS
61
100%
Price, €
€575.67
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.33/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€575.67
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€333.33
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€539.64
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€692.68
In Stock
Radeon 660M vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 660M vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 660M vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 660M
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
30.4 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
45.6 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
1.459 TFLOPS
16%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
113.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
283.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.062 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 660M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 9th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Navi II IGP | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
40 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 30.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 113.3 GPixel/s |
| 45.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 283.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.459 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.062 TFLOPS |
