Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 Nano on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is 2686 days newer than Radeon R9 Nano.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- Performs up to 37% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Radeon R9 Nano - 485 vs 353 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 115 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 8 vs 4 GB
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
95%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
GeForce 40 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1395 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1695 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |